RGIS
31 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
01.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 2
31.08.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Not recommendable employer.
Blumberg 3
17.11.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Blumberg 4
05.10.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. High payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Blumberg 5
15.10.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Blumberg 6
09.11.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Blumberg 7
28.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Beneficial career. Reasonable job provider.
Blumberg 8
16.11.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Blumberg 9
08.07.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Blumberg 10
12.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Essen 11
29.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Essen 12
02.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Flensburg 13
04.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Hamburg 14
15.03.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Hamburg 15
20.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Filling employment. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Hamburg 16
04.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Excellent activity. Below-average salary. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Hamburg 17
08.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Hannover 18
15.12.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 19
11.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 20
10.04.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 21
15.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 22
10.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 23
24.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 24
29.12.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 25
25.03.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Leipzig 26
02.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Leipzig 27
23.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leipzig 28
12.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 29
01.12.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 30
05.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 31
27.11.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Interesting tasks. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
