T-Systems
59 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
02.05.2006
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 2
01.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 3
01.08.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 4
03.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 5
14.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 6
23.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 7
27.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 8
18.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 9
03.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 10
19.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 11
27.03.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Useful management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 12
25.12.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 13
04.12.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 14
01.03.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 15
28.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Frankfurt 16
13.07.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt 17
13.07.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt 18
31.08.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 19
31.08.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 20
23.08.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Filling employment. High payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 21
14.09.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Hamburg 22
23.07.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 23
24.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 24
10.09.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 25
21.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Excellent activity. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 26
08.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Koblenz 27
24.05.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Excellent activity. High payments. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Leinfelden 28
12.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Leinfelden 29
22.07.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 30
04.08.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 31
28.09.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 32
12.03.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Excellent employer.
Leinfelden 33
15.04.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 34
08.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Interesting tasks. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Leinfelden 35
15.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Leinfelden 36
16.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 37
25.06.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Leinfelden 38
27.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 39
05.05.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 40
26.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 41
21.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 42
23.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Leinfelden 43
12.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 44
20.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 45
29.07.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 46
02.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Leinfelden 47
24.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Leinfelden 48
01.09.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 49
19.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 50
10.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 51
01.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Leinfelden 52
09.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Leinfelden 53
16.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 54
02.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Munich 55
08.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Munich 56
01.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 57
14.03.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Stuttgart 58
15.06.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. Satisfactory employment site.
Wilhelmshaven 59
11.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
