Ontex
69 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Bautzen 1
05.08.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Grosspostwitz 2
26.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Grosspostwitz 3
15.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Grosspostwitz 4
26.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Grosspostwitz 5
04.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Useful management. No filling operation. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Grosspostwitz 6
04.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Großpostwitz 7
15.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Useful management. No filling operation. First class salary. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Grosspostwitz 8
21.10.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Grosspostwitz 9
21.10.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. First class salary. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Großpostwitz 10
17.01.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Großpostwitz 11
03.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Großpostwitz 12
11.09.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Not recommendable employer.
Grosspostwitz 13
15.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Satisfactory staff work. No filling operation. First class salary. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Großpostwitz 14
30.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Reasonable job provider.
Großpostwitz 15
03.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Großpostwitz 16
18.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Grosspostwitz 17
29.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. High payments. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 18
22.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 19
05.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 20
16.07.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 21
30.03.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 22
14.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 23
14.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 24
21.09.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 25
29.07.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 26
03.07.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 27
17.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 28
13.01.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 29
15.03.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 30
10.08.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 31
11.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 32
08.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 33
18.01.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 34
16.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 35
21.04.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 36
05.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 37
03.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Mayen 38
13.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. High payments. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Mayen 39
09.02.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Mayen 40
03.05.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Recommendable workplace.
Mayen 41
09.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Mayen 42
29.08.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Mayen 43
16.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. First class salary. Beneficial career. Excellent employer.
Mayen 44
31.10.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Excellent employer.
Mayen 45
07.11.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. High payments. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Mayen 46
31.10.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Excellent employer.
Mayen 47
31.10.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Mayen 48
24.10.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Mayen 49
13.08.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Mayen 50
14.07.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Mayen 51
05.03.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Mayen 52
07.01.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Mayen 53
05.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Mayen 54
12.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Mayen 55
21.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Mayen 56
10.07.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Mayen 57
29.09.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Not recommendable employer.
Mayen 58
01.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Mayen 59
11.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Impeccable Leadership. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Mayen 60
17.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. High payments. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Mayen 61
18.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Mayen 62
02.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Mayen 63
18.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Mayen 64
11.06.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Recklighausen 65
31.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Satisfactory staff work. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Satisfactory employment site.
Recklinghausen 66
05.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Recommendable workplace.
Recklinghausen 67
27.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Not recommendable employer.
Recklinghausen 68
06.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Good Management. Filling employment. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Recklinghausen 69
16.10.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Not recommendable employer.
