Merkur Spielothek
20 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Augsburg 1
24.06.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Duisburg 2
13.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Gießen 3
25.08.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Gießen 4
13.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Filling employment. Fair payments. Recommendable workplace.
Göttingen 5
03.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Hamburg 6
08.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Excellent activity. High payments. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 7
26.11.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 8
28.03.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 9
17.11.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
27.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 11
25.02.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 12
12.02.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 13
10.09.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 14
20.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 15
27.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. Below-average salary. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 16
15.08.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Osnabrück 17
16.08.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Osnabrück 18
13.11.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Worms 19
21.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Beneficial career. Employers with criticisms.
Worms 20
14.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Beneficial career. Employers with criticisms.