KPMG
20 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
28.01.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Berlin 2
17.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Interesting tasks. First class salary. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 3
08.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 4
09.04.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 5
26.09.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 6
29.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Bremen 7
23.04.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. High payments. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Düsseldorf 8
12.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Excellent activity. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Frankfurt a.M. 9
07.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 10
13.07.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Germany 11
18.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 12
22.05.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 13
18.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 14
26.02.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 15
13.05.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Cologne 16
11.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Cologne 17
21.11.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. High payments. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Leipzig 18
18.02.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
London 19
13.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Salzburg 20
06.11.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.