Debeka
37 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
20.08.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Bielefeld 2
16.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Beneficial career. Reasonable job provider.
Darmstadt 3
25.01.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Düren 4
19.10.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Freiburg 5
23.10.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Hannover 6
18.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Heinsberg 7
05.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Ingolstadt 8
06.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Germany 9
13.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Germany 10
11.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 11
09.10.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 12
17.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 13
30.11.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 14
28.07.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 15
06.09.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 16
28.08.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 17
23.07.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 18
13.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Excellent activity. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 19
05.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 20
18.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 21
22.03.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 22
04.12.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Kassel 23
16.02.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Koblenz 24
30.03.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. Fair payments. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Koblenz 25
14.02.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Koblenz 26
01.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Koblenz 27
10.06.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Koblenz 28
07.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Koblenz 29
19.09.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Good Management. Excellent activity. Demotivating income. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Koblenz 30
12.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Koblenz 31
15.04.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Satisfactory staff work. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Excellent employer.
Koblenz 32
02.05.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Mecklenburg 33
11.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Interesting tasks. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Mölln 34
29.12.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Saarlouis 35
25.04.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Schweinfurt 36
21.06.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
St. Ingbert 37
25.06.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
